Para que veais que no hay que fiarse mucho de las comparativas que se estan haciendo ultimamente enfrentando a las dos consolas ( donde aun no comprendo el objetivo, puesto que para mi deberian centrarse en ellas por separado ), fijaos en lo que dicen dos grandes portales sobre Assassin's:
IGN: "The frame rate is not only far more noticeable, but you can see the difference between the two consoles at any point in the game, not just large open environments. Simply rotate the camera around Altair in the first town and the PS3 clearly runs a good 5 to 10 frames a second behind 360. This really becomes apparent when performing a quick move like the leap of faith from a building's ledge. What looks highly stylized on 360 only highlights the poor frame rate of the PS3."
IGN dice que PS3 tiene peor tasa de imágenes.
Gamespot: "There are few differences between the Xbox 360 and PlayStation 3 versions. PS3 owners are blessed with a slightly more solid frame rate, although the 360 version features a little more contrast in the lighting, so it's pretty much a wash. But regardless of which platform you go with, you'll have an amazing and unforgettable game. Assassin's Creed is the kind of game you tell your friends about, and one that should be in your collection."
Gamespot dice que PS3 tiene mejor tasa de imágenes. Las dos tienen Video-review y dicen exactamente lo mismo.
Una dice lo contrario a la otra. ¿porque?.
En mi opinion personal, estamos en una epoca donde parece que las desarrolladoras empiezan a hacer las cosas bien, y se nota. Call of Duty 4 tiene una superior tasa de frames con las misma calidad gráfica, y las dos versiones de Assassin's (xbox360 y ps3) son practicamente iguales.
Cualquiera puede probar una y otra y opinar en consecuencia.
Un saludo.
IGN: "The frame rate is not only far more noticeable, but you can see the difference between the two consoles at any point in the game, not just large open environments. Simply rotate the camera around Altair in the first town and the PS3 clearly runs a good 5 to 10 frames a second behind 360. This really becomes apparent when performing a quick move like the leap of faith from a building's ledge. What looks highly stylized on 360 only highlights the poor frame rate of the PS3."
IGN dice que PS3 tiene peor tasa de imágenes.
Gamespot: "There are few differences between the Xbox 360 and PlayStation 3 versions. PS3 owners are blessed with a slightly more solid frame rate, although the 360 version features a little more contrast in the lighting, so it's pretty much a wash. But regardless of which platform you go with, you'll have an amazing and unforgettable game. Assassin's Creed is the kind of game you tell your friends about, and one that should be in your collection."
Gamespot dice que PS3 tiene mejor tasa de imágenes. Las dos tienen Video-review y dicen exactamente lo mismo.
Una dice lo contrario a la otra. ¿porque?.
En mi opinion personal, estamos en una epoca donde parece que las desarrolladoras empiezan a hacer las cosas bien, y se nota. Call of Duty 4 tiene una superior tasa de frames con las misma calidad gráfica, y las dos versiones de Assassin's (xbox360 y ps3) son practicamente iguales.
Cualquiera puede probar una y otra y opinar en consecuencia.
Un saludo.